Structure before surface
The class system and the CMS model get decided before the first section is built. It is the difference between a site your team extends and a site your team is afraid to touch.
About the studio
No account managers, no handover to a team you have not met, no site that only its builder understands. Just a clear scope, a fixed date and a build your team can keep extending.
01Studio story
maztech is a small Webflow studio. We build the kind of site a marketing team can run on its own: structured properly, documented on handover, and fast enough that nobody has to apologise for it in a meeting.
Work usually arrives in one of two states. Either there is a finished design file and a launch date, or there is a site that has quietly stopped fitting the business. Both start the same way, with an audit and a written scope, because the projects that go wrong are almost always the ones where nobody agreed what was being built.
We keep the studio small on purpose. The person who plans your build is the person who builds it, so nothing is lost between an account manager and a developer you never speak to. You get a staging link on day one and a walkthrough every week until launch.
We also turn work down. If a project needs something Webflow cannot carry well, we say so at the audit rather than three weeks into a build, when saying it is expensive for everyone.
Cloned templates, undocumented builds, or a class system only the original builder can read.
A written audit before the build, a staging link from day one, and a recorded handover at the end.
02Values
These are the reasons a project takes the shape it does, and the reasons we occasionally argue with a brief.
The class system and the CMS model get decided before the first section is built. It is the difference between a site your team extends and a site your team is afraid to touch.
A fixed page inventory, a fixed component list and a fixed date, agreed in writing before the build starts. Changes are priced openly rather than absorbed and resented.
Every build ends with a named component library, a documented content model and a recorded walkthrough. If you never call us again, the site still works.
Image sizing, font loading and interaction weight get decided while building, not bolted on in a rushed week before launch when it is too late to change anything.
03The team
Small enough that you speak to the people building it, structured enough that nothing falls between them.
Build architecture
Sets the class structure, the component library and the breakpoint behaviour, then builds the templates everything else is cloned from. Also the person who tells you when a design decision will be expensive to maintain.
Design to build fidelity
Works between the Figma file and the canvas: spacing scales, type ramps, hover and focus states, and the interactions that carry the design rather than decorate it. Runs the side-by-side design QA before launch.
CMS and editor experience
Models the collections, references and templates around how your team writes, migrates existing content, and writes the editor guide. The reason your team is publishing on day one instead of week three.
On a small landing page one person may cover two of these roles. On a CMS build or an ecommerce project they are always three separate people, because the failure modes are different and so is the attention each one needs.
04Why Webflow
Webflow is a deliberate choice rather than the only tool we know. Here is the honest case for it.
Content, images and new CMS entries go live from the editor. Nothing sits in a queue waiting for a developer to have a free afternoon.
Building visually against real content closes the gap between the design file and the shipped page, so nothing quietly degrades on the way to production.
Global CDN, SSL, backups and versioning come with the platform, so a small team is not maintaining infrastructure it never wanted to own.
Collections, references, ecommerce, logic and custom code cover far more than most sites need. When a project genuinely outgrows it, we say so at the audit rather than three weeks into a build.
Complex user accounts, heavy transactional logic, a product that is really an application rather than a site, or a content model that needs relationships far past what collections can express. When a brief looks like one of those, we say so at the audit and point you somewhere better suited, rather than taking the project and finding out together.
Next step
A short brief is enough to start. We will come back with questions, a scope and a date, and tell you plainly if we are not the right studio for it.
Studio hours are 9am to 6pm across US and EU time zones, Monday to Friday.